 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| To schedule a consultation, call tel. (281) 340-2027 or (281) 980-1385. |
| 14090 SOUTHWEST FREEWAY, SUITE 300, SUGAR LAND, TX 77478 TEL. (281) 340-2027; (281) 980-1385; TOLL FREE FAX 1 (866) 416-0059 E-MAIL: questions@gcastillolaw.com |
| This website is designed and managed by Z-Media Publishing and Design e-mail: design@z-mediapd.com |
NEWS & ARTICLES
IP NEWS & ARTICLES:
IMMIGRATION NEWS:
| NOTABLE IMMIGRATION QUOTES |
Many of the problems with the immigration adjudication system can be traced back to the harshness,
complexity and opacity of substantive immigration law. —ABA study
Substantive immigration law is “complex, obtuse, and, at times, unintelligible.”—From Kevin R. Johnson, Ten
Guiding Principles for Truly Comprehensive Immigration Reform: A Blueprint
The inadmissibility and deportability grounds are broad, strict, confusing and unforgiving.— Supreme Court
Justice Alito and Padilla v. Kentucky
“Immigration cases like [Drax v. Reno] vividly illustrates the labyrinthine character of modern immigration law-
a maze of hyper-technical statutes and regulations that engender waste, delay, and confusion for the
Government and petitioners alike.”
Practicing immigration law requires a high level of fight, with the understanding that the substantive law and
the attitude of enforcement officers are heavily stacked against your client, and that there is little to no room
for compromise.--Beyond Decisional Independence: Uncovering Contributors to the Immigration
Adjudication Crisis
The pool of available attorneys who possess the necessary expertise, sophistication and stamina to
[ethically] practice immigration law is small. -- Beyond Decisional Independence: Uncovering Contributors to
the Immigration Adjudication Crisis
complexity and opacity of substantive immigration law. —ABA study
Substantive immigration law is “complex, obtuse, and, at times, unintelligible.”—From Kevin R. Johnson, Ten
Guiding Principles for Truly Comprehensive Immigration Reform: A Blueprint
The inadmissibility and deportability grounds are broad, strict, confusing and unforgiving.— Supreme Court
Justice Alito and Padilla v. Kentucky
“Immigration cases like [Drax v. Reno] vividly illustrates the labyrinthine character of modern immigration law-
a maze of hyper-technical statutes and regulations that engender waste, delay, and confusion for the
Government and petitioners alike.”
Practicing immigration law requires a high level of fight, with the understanding that the substantive law and
the attitude of enforcement officers are heavily stacked against your client, and that there is little to no room
for compromise.--Beyond Decisional Independence: Uncovering Contributors to the Immigration
Adjudication Crisis
The pool of available attorneys who possess the necessary expertise, sophistication and stamina to
[ethically] practice immigration law is small. -- Beyond Decisional Independence: Uncovering Contributors to
the Immigration Adjudication Crisis